Nigeria’s path to a competitive economy

This is not speculation because the evidence is written in our own history. During oil booms, the naira appreciates, making imported goods cheaper and weakening local factories. Textile mills that once employed tens of thousands in Kaduna, Kano and Aba collapsed. Industrial clusters that should have matured into hubs of learning were replaced by import warehouses and trading companies. The country’s manufacturing share of GDP, which rose steadily in the 1970s and 1980s, stagnated in the decades that followed. The Dutch Disease, where resource wealth undermines other productive sectors, is not a foreign concept. It is a Nigerian reality.

Studies show that resource-dependent countries often struggle not because they lack money, but because the easy money distracts from the hard work of development. Windfalls create political incentives to distribute patronage rather than build broad-based capabilities. The result is a pattern Nigerians know too well: big budgets, little structural progress. But the story does not have to end this way. Chile used copper revenues to build a sovereign wealth fund and diversify into salmon farming, fruits, wine and forestry. Norway used oil to create one of the world’s most sophisticated welfare and innovation systems. Botswana used diamonds to fund education and sound macroeconomic management. What these countries share is not natural resources. It is institutions that convert resource rents into long-term capability building. Nigeria can do the same, but only if it makes strategic choices in human capital, innovation, infrastructure, and finance.

No country has ever industrialised without investing heavily in its people. Korea’s transformation, which is documented in every development textbook, began not with factories, but with schools. From universal primary education in the 1960s to the vast expansion of science and engineering in later decades, Korea built the world’s most disciplined, technically skilled workforce long before it became an electronics powerhouse.

Nigeria remains far behind this curve. The challenges we face include out-of-school children in the Northwest and Northeast; weak foundational literacy; limited vocational training; and an overstretched university system wrestling with inadequate funding and brain drain. Yet, our demographic window remains open. The successes of the past, such as the rise of Nigerian doctors, software developers, and creative professionals abroad, prove what is possible when Nigerian talent meets opportunity. If Nigeria is serious about escaping stagnation, human capital development must become a national obsession, not a paragraph in a policy document.

Middle-income countries fall into a trap when they continue relying on imported technologies long after wages have risen. This is where many Latin American countries stalled. They industrialised early but did not develop strong domestic innovation systems, and eventually lost competitiveness to Asia.

Nigeria risks a similar pattern, and though some may argue that Lagos, Enugu and Port Harcourt have thriving tech communities, the country has not yet built a national innovation system. Our research intensity remains extremely low, and collaboration between universities and industry is minimal. Many Nigerian firms adopt technology but do not create or adapt it. The renewed push toward local refining, petrochemicals, digital services, and agri-tech offers a path forward if backed by serious investment in research institutions, STEM education, technical colleges, and technology parks that function beyond ribbon-cutting ceremonies. Countries that wait for innovation to emerge organically wait forever.

Nigeria’s infrastructure deficit is not news. But its economic consequences are often underappreciated. High logistics costs, poor road networks, unreliable electricity, congested ports, and limited broadband penetration all combine to trap Nigerian firms in low-productivity activities.

A company cannot compete globally when it runs on diesel. A farmer cannot join export value chains if their produce spoils before reaching the port. A start-up cannot scale with erratic internet. Here again, lessons from East Asia are striking. Korea built world-class highways and ports before it became rich. It rolled out broadband ahead of most developed countries. Infrastructure was not an afterthought; it was a growth strategy.

Nigeria’s recent push for road concessions, port reform, metro rail projects, and digital infrastructure under the current administration is a step in the right direction. But scale and consistency matter. Without sustained investment, Nigeria will remain a high-cost economy in a low-cost world.

Read Also: Nigeria prepares to roll out Lenacapavir as twice-yearly HIV prevention option

Diversification requires patient capital, that is, loans for 10 to 15 years, affordable credit for manufacturers, venture finance for technology, and development banks capable of underwriting industrial risk. This is where many developing economies fail, and Nigeria is no exception. High interest rates, shallow credit markets, and limited long-term financing mean that Nigerian firms rarely invest in machinery, R&D, or export capacity. The result is visible in the vibrant entrepreneurship at the micro level, but weak competitiveness at the industrial level. Reforms underway in the financial sector, including recapitalisation and an emphasis on credit to the real sector, must be aligned with a broader industrial strategy. No country climbs the product ladder without a financial system willing to fund the climb.

The way forward for Nigeria lies in treating its oil wealth not as a cushion that softens the blows of economic shocks, but as a springboard for a deliberate national transformation. The country must redirect resource earnings toward the foundations of long-term prosperity through world-class education, modern infrastructure, and the technical capability that fuels innovation. At the same time, diversification must grow from sectors where Nigeria already has emerging strengths, such as agro-processing, petrochemicals, digital services, pharmaceuticals, and logistics. These are the adjacent sectors where the country can most easily scale up capabilities and build export competitiveness. Sustained investment in efficient ports, reliable power, broadband connectivity, and modern transport corridors will be critical to lowering production costs and supporting domestic firms.

Nigeria is often described as a country with potential, but potential is not destiny. The world is full of nations that remain stuck despite abundant resources. It is also full of countries that transformed themselves through deliberate, disciplined, long-term strategy. If Nigeria takes the right lessons from global development pathways and learns from its own history of missed opportunities, the next decade could finally shift the country from a commodity-dependent economy to a diversified, resilient, and prosperous one. The choice is still ours at the end of the day.

•Okeke is a post-graduate student at the KDI School of Public Policy and Management, South Korea.