Oyo 2027: Chieftaincy can't stop anyone from contesting election - Lawyer
A constitutional lawyer, Adebisi Adeyemo, has stated that no Nigerian citizen can be prevented from participating in elective politics based on chieftaincy expectations or eligibility for a traditional stool. Adeyemo
- ...says Alli, others can seek elective positions despite being Ibadan High Chiefs
- By Segun Showunmi, Ibadan
A constitutional lawyer, Adebisi Adeyemo, has stated that no Nigerian citizen can be prevented from participating in elective politics based on chieftaincy expectations or eligibility for a traditional stool.
Adeyemo described such attempts as unconstitutional, maintaining that the 1999 Constitution of the Federal Republic of Nigeria remains the supreme authority on political participation.
His remarks come amid concerns over alleged administrative and customary moves to limit the political ambitions of some high-ranking chiefs in Oyo State, including the Senator representing Oyo South, Sharafadeen Alli, as well as High Chiefs Akeem Bolaji Adewoyin and Kola Babalola.
Alli, a former Secretary to the State Government under ex-governor Rashidi Ladoja, is believed to have the backing of the Olubadan for the All Progressives Congress governorship ticket in the 2027 general elections.
Speaking with The Nation, Adeyemo cited Section 1 of the Constitution, stressing that its provisions override all other authorities and persons, and render any inconsistent action null and void.
He further referenced Sections 65 and 106, which guarantee qualified citizens the right to contest for elective offices, noting that Sections 66 and 107 clearly spell out the grounds for disqualification. According to him, none of these provisions includes chieftaincy status or expectations.
“Any attempt to introduce additional disqualification criteria outside the Constitution is legally untenable,” he said.
Adeyemo also addressed the role of the Ministry of Local Government and Chieftaincy Matters, stating that it lacks the constitutional authority to restrict citizens’ political rights or enforce customary expectations as binding legal obligations.
He maintained that any such action would be ultra vires, constitutionally invalid, and open to judicial challenge.
Drawing a clear distinction, the lawyer explained that eligibility for a traditional stool does not create a legal obligation that overrides constitutionally guaranteed rights.
He stressed that democratic participation must remain guided strictly by constitutional provisions, warning against attempts to elevate customary practices above the law.
“Individuals who are merely eligible or nominated for a throne retain full political rights. Only those who have been formally installed as traditional rulers may be subject to expectations of political neutrality."
Adeyemo reinforced his argument with historical examples demonstrating the coexistence of traditional status and political participation.
He first cited Oba Adesoji Aderemi, the Ooni of Ife, who served as Governor of the Western Region from 1960 to 1962 while maintaining his traditional position, clearly illustrating that traditional authority does not conflict with political engagement.
He also referenced Moshood Kashimawo Olawale Abiola, widely known as M.K.O. Abiola, who held multiple chieftaincy titles yet contested and is widely regarded as having won the 1993 presidential election.
"Similarly, Nnamdi Azikiwe, who held several traditional titles, rose to become Nigeria’s first President without any constitutional impediment.
"In addition, Oba Adedotun Aremu Gbadebo was cited as an example of personal choice in accepting traditional rulership, having voluntarily ascended the throne after a distinguished career in public service.
Applying these principles, Adeyemo maintained that High Chief Adewoyin, High Chief Ali, and High Chief Babalola retain their full constitutional rights to contest elections, participate in governance, and associate politically.
He described any attempt to restrict these rights based on chieftaincy expectations as legally unfounded, administratively improper, and constitutionally void.
The legal expert urged all stakeholders in Oyo State to respect constitutional provisions and avoid actions that could generate unnecessary tension.
“Political disagreements must remain within lawful bounds, and misinterpretation of the law must not be used as a tool for conflict."
Adeyemo, however, said the Constitution provides no ambiguity on the issue.
“Chieftaincy expectation cannot be imposed as a legal obligation. Political participation is a fundamental constitutional right, and any attempt to curtail it outside the provisions of the Constitution is null and void."
Quoting former U.S. President Abraham Lincoln, he added: “Elections belong to the people. It is their decision.”
He reiterated that the rights of the affected high chiefs remain fully protected under the law and called for strict adherence to constitutional principles in the interest of peace, stability, and democratic progress.
