The old world order (I)
It must be stated quite clearly right at the get go that the recently much touted new world order does not exist at this point in time. At best, it
It must be stated quite clearly right at the get go that the recently much touted new world order does not exist at this point in time. At best, it can only be said to be in the offing. Having said that however, one can go on to say confidently that in global terms, things ain't what they used to be. It can even be said that there are strong trends which are consistent with that era when the winds of change blew through Africa in the period after the Second World War. Those winds toppled the colonial empires which before the war had created their own world order that threatened to last forever, or so it seemed. Looking back however, it is clear that the dawn which followed those winds of change was a false one. The winds blew alright but in reality, the more things seemed to change, the more they remained the same or even became worse. At this point, one is reminded of the story of the man who was rid of some pestilential spirits and for a while, became whole again. The spirits in the meantime roamed out of doors, suffering all kinds of deprivation. In an act of desperation, those now homeless spirits paid an exploratory visit to their old home which had been reset to factory fittings and therefore sparkled with brightness. The spirits simply recolonised their old home to the very painful detriment of their host whose new state was described as being worse than the old. It can be seen from this story that a new order does not necessarily mean an improvement on the old one, unless of course, the spirits of the old order are completely exorcised, creating room for a brand new order. It is quite clear that at this point in time, conditions for the establishment of a new world order have not yet been established and we are still left with the old order on our hands.
It is not now debatable that an American order was imposed on the world immediately after the Second World War and that order subsists today, however shaky it now seems to be. It is no coincidence that all the institutions through which that order is controlled have their headquarters in New York or at least somewhere else on American soil. Once every year, all world leaders head to New York for the annual meeting of the United Nations but we all know that all the decisions taken, if any are taken at all, are at the behest of the Americans. Furthermore, even at the Security Council, a crushing veto awaits any resolution that is not to the liking of the USA and her Western allies who hold a majority on that Council. In addition, the West enjoys the same strangle hold on trade and economic matters in general and award to themselves the leadership of what they call the free world even though that much vaunted freedom is to the detriment of the rest of us. It is nothing but a cheat code which works only in the interest of Western imperialist countries who have seized all available cards which they play as the spirit moves them. It can be seen from the above that there are formidable obstacles in the way of a new world order if only because the continued viability of the old world order is not yet in serious doubt.
We need not wonder why the old world order has been forced on the rest of us, the operative word here being force. At the end of WWII, the victors in that war were the USA and the USSR and they were separated by an ideological gulf so deep as to be unbridgeable. Consequently, the world was divided into two unequal but fiercely competing parts. The two parts competed for the hearts and minds of all the countries outside their respective sphere of influence especially in the emerging countries of Asia and Africa, mainly as the West occupied Western Germany and Japan and the USSR stationed their troops in the Eastern European countries which they had liberated from German occupation during the Second World War.The USA together with the old colonial powers of Britain, France, Belgium and Portugal in collaboration with the white supremacist regimes in South Africa and Rhodesia were interested in setting up their own order in Africa so that they could continue to exploit Africa as they had always done. The agenda was simply to devise the ways and means by which there was the transfer of industrial raw materials, from the global South to the rich countries of the global West. This being the case, the Portuguese who were stubbornly interested in holding on to their African colonies received the unalloyed support of NATO forces as the arms which were used in the ensuing struggle against the liberation fighters operating in their colonies were supplied by that alliance. The USA and her allies were also on the side of white supremacist groups in southern Africa and right until the bitter end subverted every attempt to bring majority rule to South Africa. On the other hand, all the arms and logistic support which the liberation groups used to force the issue of freedom came from the Soviet Union and China with Cuba supplying troops at a critical point in Angola.
Advertisement
300x250
Read Also: History on the run
Africa has been part of some world order for close to six hundred years now and her part in that order has hardly changed. First there was the slave trade in which millions of Africans were transported as commodity out of Africa and their labour brutally exploited in plantations all across the New World. When the system of chattel slavery became unsustainable, colonialism became the vogue and both the human and natural resources of Africa were seized and taken out of Africa. Central and South America shared the same fate but this time, their principal oppressors were their neighbour from the north, the United States. It is simply mind boggling to think that several Latin American countries are described as banana republics for the simple reason that their economy depended on the growth and export of bananas, just bananas. They were set up as banana republics by powerful American companies which had caught them by the throat and forced them to produce bananas for the enjoyment of pampered Americans. The same scenario was repeated country after country in that region. Whatever happened there was according to a script written by American businesses to support their own private interests. The case of Guatemala is typical.
When Jacobo Arbenz came to power as President of Guatemala in 1951, he was determined to improve the lot of the ordinary citizens of his country, most of whom were landless. In order to ameliorate the appalling conditions under which his people lived, he expropriated all fallow lands and distributed them to landless peasants. The sticking point here was that no less than 42% of land in Guatemala at that time was owned outright by the United Fruit Company of America. As such, that appropriation agenda was never going to be allowed to stand and it did not. Under direct orders from President Eisenhower, the CIA orchestrated a coup, in reality an invasion which led to the ousting of Arbenz and precipitated a long, drawn out political crisis which led to a thirty-six year civil war which claimed an estimated 200,000 lives, not to mention the widespread destruction of property. Between then and now, virtually every country in that region has been made to undergo the pain of regime change followed by economic destabilisation orchestrated by the CIA. Today, that region is a wasteland from which everyone is determined to flee. Their destination is the United States from where they are now being deported with extreme prejudice. The chaos that characterises Latin America today, is part and parcel of the old global order which is now showing signs of decay, or is it?



